ABSTRACT
Fungal infections are emerging as a major problem in part due to high mortality associated with systemic infections, especially in the case of immunocompromised patients. With the development of new treatments for diseases such as cancer and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome pandemic, the number of immunosuppressed patients has increased and, as a consequence, also the number of invasive fungal infections has increased. Several studies have proposed new strategies for the development of effective fungal vaccines. In addition, better understanding of how the immune system works against fungal pathogens has improved the further development of these new vaccination strategies. As a result, some fungal vaccines have advanced through clinical trials. However, there are still many challenges that prevent the clinical development of fungal vaccines that can efficiently immunise subjects at risk of developing invasive fungal infections. In this review, we will discuss these new vaccination strategies and the challenges that they present. In the future with proper investments, fungal vaccines may soon become a reality.
Subject(s)
Humans , Fungal Vaccines/immunology , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Mycoses/prevention & control , Vaccination/methods , Adaptive Immunity/physiology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Immunity, Innate/physiology , Technology, Pharmaceutical , Vaccination/trendsABSTRACT
SUMMARYParacoccidioidomycosis (PCM), caused by Paracoccidioides spp, is an important endemic mycosis in Latin America. There are two recognized Paracoccidioides species, P. brasiliensis and P. lutzii, based on phylogenetic differences; however, the pathogenesis and disease manifestations of both are indistinguishable at present. Approximately 1,853 (~51,2%) of 3,583 confirmed deaths in Brazil due to systemic mycoses from 1996-2006 were caused by PCM. Antifungal treatment is required for patients with PCM. The initial treatment lasts from two to six months and sulfa derivatives, amphotericin B, azoles and terbinafine are used in clinical practice; however, despite prolonged therapy, relapses are still a problem. An effective Th1-biased cellular immune response is essential to control the disease, which can be induced by exogenous antigens or modulated by prophylactic or therapeutic vaccines. Stimulation of B cells or passive transference of monoclonal antibodies are also important means that may be used to improve the efficacy of paracoccidioidomycosis treatment in the future. This review critically details major challenges facing the development of a vaccine to combat PCM.
RESUMOA paracoccidioidomicose (PCM), causada por Paracoccidioides spp, é importante micose endêmica na América Latina. Com base em diferenças filogenéticas, existem duas espécies reconhecidas de Paracoccidioides, P. brasiliensis e P. lutzii, no entanto, a patogênese e as manifestações clínicas de ambas são indistinguíveis atualmente. Aproximadamente 1853 (~51,2%) de 3583 mortes confirmadas, atribuídas a micoses sistêmicas de 1996-2006, no Brasil foram causadas por PCM. Tratamento antifúngico é necessário para pacientes com PCM. O tratamento inicial dura de dois a seis meses e derivados de sulfa, anfotericina B, azóis e terbinafina são utilizados na prática clínica; no entanto, apesar da terapêutica prolongada, as recaídas ainda são um problema. Uma resposta imune celular eficaz, tendendo a Th1, é essencial para controlar a doença que pode ser induzida por antígenos exógenos, ou moduladas por vacinas profiláticas ou terapêuticas. A estimulação de células B ou a transferência passiva de anticorpos monoclonais também são meios importantes que podem ser utilizados para melhorar a eficácia do tratamento da paracoccidioidomicose no futuro. Esta revisão detalha criticamente os principais desafios que o desenvolvimento de uma vacina para combater a PCM enfrenta.